The RACI Authority Matrix

During the design phase of a new project, service or product implementation to identify roles and responsibilities both during and after delivery into production operation
As an aid during organizational change or change programmes
During Business As Usual activities, to clarify roles and responsibilities of or between teams or relating to a service or specific set of technologies
Ongoing, as an enabler during Service Improvement (SIP) activities, allowing roles and responsibilities and activities to be linked to service improvement initiatives
During development of Operational Level Agreements (OLAs) and Underpinning Contracts (UCs) to ensure all roles and responsibilities are clearly understood and support SLAs and SLRs
For ongoing use by Team Managers, linking activities to Critical Success Factors, Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) etc.
Periodically, to enable Team Managers to link activities to appraisal objectives
Lack of clarity regarding roles and responsibilities (by both management and Support team members)
Activity duplication resulting in increased costsInability to support customer SLAs as service roles and responsibilities are not alligned
Lack of activity ownership
Lack of understanding relating to a new service / product before it is transitioned into production
Contact and escalation difficulties by Service Desk and support teams
The clear definition of who is responsible for each defined activity
Clarity around expectations for each role
Increased productivity through well defined accountability
Reduced overlap and minimized gaps
Elimination of conflict around who does what
Enables a snapshot view of tasks with activities and processes
Creates opportunity to re-engineer tasks if necessary as part of Continual Service Improvement activities
Improved planning / communication die to increased team member participation
Enables consensus and agreement
Identify all of the activities / tasks / processes involved. This is best achieved by:
Interviewing the team(s) and people responsible for delivering the activities
Undertaking a brain storming session to identify all known roles and responsibilities
Developing a high level process flow diagram identifying the key stages / activities
Listing the identified tasks / roles and responsibilities for each stage / activity
Create a new spreadsheet / matrix
List the identified activities down the left hand column of the spreadsheet
Identify all of the resources / roles involved and list then along the top row of the matrix
Complete the cells of the matrix, identifying who is responsible for the R,A,C and I roles for each identified task
R - RESPONSIBLE
Owner who is RESPONSIBLE for the task delivery. This is usually somebody appointed by a group to deliver the task, or somebody whom the Accountable person has delegated to deliver in a particular circumstance. There should preferably be only one “R” per activity.
A - ACCOUNTABLE
This is the person to whom the "R" is ACCOUNTABLE for delivering the task. This may involve the sign off (APPROVAL) of a task. The Accountable person has ultimate responsibility for ensuring the “R” delivers. There should be only one “A” per activity.
C – CONSULTED
Any resource that is to be CONSULTED because they have information and / or capability necessary to complete the work, which cannot be completed without their input. This is a two way communication. There can be none or multiple “C” resources assigned.
I – INFORMED
All resources to be INFORMED during the delivery or must be notified of results, without the need to be CONSULTED. This is a one way communication to all relevant resources. There can be none or multiple “I” resources assigned.
Every task should have only one A and preferably only one R as a general principle. A gap occurs when a process exists with no A or R (no one is accountable or responsible). an overlap occurs when multiple roles exist that have an R for a given process
Resolve overlaps where multiple Rs exist for an activity, zoom in and add further detail relating to the subtasks associated with the activity. This will add further clarity and help to establish responsibilities
Resolve gaps. The simpler case to address is the resolution of a gap. where no role is identified that is responsible for a task, the Process Manager with the authority for the group or role identified must determine which existing role is responsible or whether a new role is required
|
|
Programme
Manager
|
Project
Manager
|
Steering
Committee
|
Service
Manager
|
Operations
Manager
|
|
Activity 1
|
R
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
Activity 2
|
A
|
R
|
|
S
|
C
|
|
Activity 3
|
|
RA
|
|
I
|
I
|
|
Activity 4
|
A
|
|
|
R
|
C
|
|
Activity 5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Activity 6
|
A
|
R
|
|
|
S
|




